Conclusion
Creating a mathematical model of human action and integrating individual values into group values is not trivial. Fractally is built on some basic principles, including an ordinal value linked to a Pareto scale (defined by Fibbionacci) combined with statistical sampling to overcome the computational impossibility of measuring and integrating everyone’s rank preferences in the absence of a transitive relationship of rankings.
Any mathematical model is only as good as the assumptions, and people are infinitely complex. Therefore, models of groups of people are impossibly complex to make definitive claims about, given the insufficiency of any model. That said, this analysis provides a strong argument in favor of the structure of fractally's governance model.
Duane makes a great point about self-ranking at 1:33
Tadas makes a great point about allowing self-voting at 1:43
Ok thank for sharing your perspective. I think that people should be able to advocate and vote for themselves in the vote phase. However, each person should be respectful of the community and aim to maximize benefit for the community. One should only vote or advocate for themselves insofar as it is for the benefit of the community
Respect is what matters, be respectful and enjoy the experience
Jason McKee makes a great point about this 25-26 minutes into the breakout room
It’s about doing what’s best for the community
On Self-Ranking
There has been discussion during Eden ƒractal and Genesis ƒractal events about self-voting. Some people think it’s best for the community to allow self-voting and some people think it’s best for the community to not allow self-voting.
During the tenth Eden ƒractal meeting, several community members voiced the opinion that this discussion is taking up too much time and we should make a decision regarding whether or not to allow self-voting so that we’ll have more time to focus on other matters.
2:40 in GF meeting 23 Felix video James mart and dan Larimer speak about this
Dan Larimer makes good point about this at 3 hours into the august 13th fractally meeting
Flexibility and spirit
If someone is voting for themselves
If a founder like Dan Larimer is doing way more than everyone else, then it makes sense for them to be able to vote for each other
Reasoning for Removing The Ability to Self-Vote
Jorge Ramos has been the most vocal proponent for not allowing self-voting. He has written several articles about fractal democracy and advocated for the
https://hive.blog/leofinance/@aguerrido/on-possible-attack-vectors-on-fractal-democracy
Reasoning for Keeping The Ability To Self-Vote
https://hive.blog/fractal/@jamesmart/re-towards-a-statistic-simulation-of-fractal-democracy
Jorge has cited the following
https://hive.blog/hive-167922/@dan/rdseal#@dan/rdseal
Current time
We can update as we go, we don’t need to de
Much of this discussion will be resolved when the UI
Jorge Ramos is the most vocal proponent for not allowing self-voting. He has written several articles about
Jorge’s post
Dan’s response to Jorge’s post
I propose that we discuss it
Potential Proposals
We see four proposals that to resolve
We Propose that we decide with
The ƒractally UI will mostly resolve the issue because you don't vote for yourself in zoom chat. It has functionality where each person can put the room in rank order but others don't see it until consensus is reached.
You can see the