1:22 Charles reads vlads eden fractal mission proposal, foster collaboration and build personal connections.
2:19 Gabriel commented he likes the mission statement, curious how to find collaboration
3:07 Dan commented Gabriel put together Eden positioning paper
3:43 Marco expands upon proposal, cultivating individual ventures, helping eos ecosystem
7:05 Elias commented on Eden mission statement, likes the eos is included
8:29 gnome introduces himself, operates eos titan, lead developer of eos network
11:57 Charles, eos support update, eos respect, preparations for Eden elections, using fractal democracy, podcast, more equal animals
16:38 perry commented on Eden telegrams,
17:50 Dan gives presentation, published 27 ef, 28 ef. Retweeted lennie recap, refined Eden fractal.com website, made 2 additional proposals.
22:47 Elias commented on Eden channel input, notice opposing viewpoints, ef purpose
26:33 Eric live stream on Monday’s , still hosting Saturday’s, take what learned at Eden fractal and trying to actually doing it, launching and training.
30:33 Vlad focused on Zeos fractal, privacy technology. Explained decentralized ideas, new features will be able to be used at Eden fractal as well. Mission of Eden fractal, foster collaboration and build personal connections
34:21 Lisa comments on decentralized governance importance, supporting creators utilizing technology, AI engagement,curious of preparation materials
39:54 Perry supports Vlad s work with Zeos, asks Lisa how situated with eos ecosystem,
40:45 Lisa responds to perry, shares a little background history
46:33 perry asks Eric name of his mission fractal
46:40 Eric responds name is Faulk( not sure if I’m getting this right) art associate weekly volunteer forum, actually doing a use case
50:27 Dan asks Charles if he was doing live reading of more equal animals
50:28 Charles responds to Dan that he’s doing an audio book on more equal animals
1:10:45 Michael responded to dans question on his first experience at meeting, a bit confusing but likes the composition and ideas
1:11:15 gnome shared a little confusion as well, suggests it would be a good idea for short summary to enter Eden fractal
1:22:23 Dan responds thanks gnome and Michael for feedback, will look into short what to do summary. Starts discussion for vlads mission proposal, currently 3 proposals 1:14:34 Vlad explains mission proposal, voting using Eden token to prioritize, mission is to foster cooperation and build personal connections amongst eos community members, goes into details
1:17:43 Dan shares vlads summary of mission in chat.
1:19:05 Marco comments on vlads proposal thinks to let it linger for a week or two, questions what does this mission statement change. Mentions action statement.
1:22:94 Eric loves mission statement, thinks it’s great to attract people, but it needs to add the why and how to foster collaboration
1:23:33 perry appreciates to create something very general. He believes the most compelling use case for Eden fractal is to hold keys to social media groups, eos community is controlled by some who aren’t actually participating
1:26:37 Dan encourages everyone can make a proposal on consortium, shares link. Commented on social media chat, it has been a big topic. Dan larimar owns edens members chat and Felix owns discord currently neither are participating. Luka is suggesting telgram bot take control.
1:29:17 Perry thinks Eden fractal offers counter balance an$ media control should be at Eden fractal.
1:30 35 Elias telegram is not meant to be decentralized, how could you make telegram work for decentralizations
1:31:11 Perry responds the same way Dan envisioned multiple chains determining their own future, but then cooperating within a group. Fractal participation is a step towards decentralization
1:33:58 Dan jumps in and reminds about hand raising, answers Elias question about decentralized telegram using web 3, have an msig. Matrix and quick pad. Went into ideas. Wants to focus more on vlads proposal
1:36:17 Elias thinking about purpose of Eden group, Eden election.com has a mission statement. Eden to become a governized structure, mission statement very broad, doesn’t mention action.
1:39:04 Charles comment eden elections occur every 3 months, amazing strength is networking, collaborate, weekly meeting added value of more strength.
1:41:07 Gabriel Wants to make a proposal into Eden fractal will be code of conduct. Another would be to use sociocratic guidelines, vlads proposal seems broad but very good. Different direction could be additional proposals. Get into rhythm of passing proposals. 1:44:47 Dan thanks Gabriel for comments, responds to question on consortium voting,
1:45:53 disagree with Gabriel on rushing on mission statement vote. Eden fractal also propping up Eden.
1:49:53 Eric thinks mission statement is valuable, what happens? How would world be different
1:50:30 Dan comments he likes that vlads proposal focuses on short term. 1:51:59 Gabriel replied to Eric, Vlad had definition of proposal in 3 points as to the why,
1:52:41 Marco comments the by products are digital value
1:54:47 Eric stated mission statements, values are worthless because it dose t impact behavior. Mission statement should say why it’s important, give ideas on how to direct.
1:57:58 Dan responds that fostering collaboration and building relationships in mission is a good point in itself. Agrees other ends and missions could be added. Vlads proposal in itself is valuable. Shared responses to proposal in chats. Generally Dan thinks vlads proposal is great, creates a nice balance. Can always be refined in future. Mentioned James mart article on mutually benefitting
2:01:09 Perry comments on his suggestion was not incompatible with vlads proposal. Compelling use case in shaping social medias.
2:04:30 Vlad comments reason of why is because the result of collaboration is self explanatory. If people collaborate, stuff gets built. Likes the governance point we could iterate, likes quicker proposal approval , more productive
2:06:28 Elias doesn’t think collaboration is the right word, feels collaboration is not occurring, common goal is community
2:09:27 dan responds to Elias on collaboration comment, remind people to elect delegates that plan on attending
2:10:56 Gabriel adds small addition to sociocracy election process, first round clarification, proposer addresses gaps, then reaction round, the objection round, causing no harm, final round integration round then if no objection it can pass. Will propose this when he gets access to consortium, helps increase efficiency
2:13:32 Vlad would highlight that clarification plus focus whether it being harmful or not, could accelerate the process 2:15:03 dan reading out chat comments, Lisa a d Marco talking about advancing governance. Eric thought proposal great but too broad to attract new members, reposted proposal link in consortium. starting to wrap up meeting.