msig consensus for eden fractal 28

Hey everyone,

Only 3 of 6 consensus posts were submitted on-chain from group 2 this week. @Charles, @Eric, and I all posted consensus with the same result:

[“gm3dgobzgage”,”yucel1453145”,”cryptozhenek”,”westreich.gm”,”bishop3dcrea”,”dan”]

@drew_block , @evgeny, and @yucel were also in this room but did not post any consensus results.

According to the rules of fractally, each room should have over 66% of results in consensus in order for participants to receive respect. We did not reach this percent of consensus posted on chain, but I’m 99.9% sure that Andrew, Evgeny, and Yucel were all in agreement with the consensus above and I think they just forgot to submit results with the on-chain app. @pnc and @Lisa were also in the room and could confirm.

You can see the video of our room here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxA59IqkMSo

I’m sure that we had over 66% consensus in this room so I proposed and approved the consensus above. Here is the proposal:

https://bloks.io/msig/dan/eftwentyeighd

Here are the consensus results:

https://eosauthority.com/account/eden.fractal?network=eos&scope=21&table=consenzus&limit=10&index_position=1&key_type=i64&reverse=0&mode=contract&sub=tables

@msig

(Respond previous proposal)

Since we’ve now passed the moderator guidelines proposal and proposal to optimize post-breakout room meetings with Vlalendas, it may be a good time to review this previous proposal to set rules for this kind of situation in the future.